A court in Delhi has sentenced two officers of the Central Bureau of Investigation to three monthsā imprisonment each in connection with an illegal search and arrest carried out over two decades ago. The case relates to an incident at a residence in Paschim Vihar, where the court found that the officers had misused their authority.
Court flags abuse of power
According to The Hindustan Times, Judicial magistrate Shashank Nandan Bhatt at Tis Hazari courts held that public officials cannot misuse their position for personal motives. The court convicted joint director Ramneesh and inspector V K Pandey under charges including house trespass, mischief and causing hurt.
The court observed that the actions of the officers were mala fide and violated legal procedures, stressing that such conduct undermines public trust in institutions.
Although the officers have been sentenced to three months in jail, the court has suspended the punishment for one month. This allows them time to file an appeal under provisions now covered by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
The offences were noted to be bailable, which also factored into the temporary relief granted by the court.
Also Read | Delhi HC flags delay in filling Minorities Commission posts, seeks answers from GNCTD
Incident dates back over two decades
The case stems from an incident in October 2000, when the officers allegedly entered the home of an Indian Revenue Service officer without due process. According to the complaint, they assaulted a gatekeeper, confined family members and forcibly carried out an arrest.
The court, in its detailed order, concluded that the officers acted in violation of legal powers and attempted to override an earlier tribunal order that had gone in favour of the complainant.
Also Read | Delhi HC allows Engineer Rashid brief bail to visit unwell father
Compensation and wider message
Apart from the jail term, the court directed the officers to pay ā¹50,000 as compensation to the complainant, acknowledging the prolonged legal battle spanning more than 25 years. Emphasising accountability, the court made it clear that public servants are expected to exercise independent judgment and cannot justify unlawful actions by citing orders from superiors.
