HDFC Bank on Wednesday rejected reports alleging irregularities in the handling of Rs 45 crore linked to the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC), pushing back against suggestions that the amount was routed through its marketing department as part of a disguised payment arrangement.
The bank said its internal oversight, audit and control systems remain robust and maintained that all matters are handled according to established procedures.
Also Read | Byju’s founder faces fresh legal blow as Singapore court orders jail term
Corruption is no longer in suitcases full of cash.
— Sandeep Manudhane (@sandeep_PT) May 27, 2026
It is now structural, institutionalized and "legal".
That is why most Indians fail to see it.#NewIndia #corruption pic.twitter.com/vICgL1gQ1i
The story gets short shrift from HDFC Bank
In a statement carried by multiple outlets, the bank said, “We strongly reject any assumptions of wrongdoing or culpability based on selective material.” The lender added that “all issues are dealt with in accordance with bank’s established norms.”
While The Economic Times reported a similar clarification from the bank saying it was rejecting any assumptions of wrongdoing or culpability.
HDFC बैंक ने कहा है कि मीडिया रिपोर्ट में जो बातें कही गई हैं, वे आधी-अधूरे और चुनिंदा दस्तावेजों (selective material) के आधार पर बनाई गई हैं. बैंक में कोई गड़बड़ी नहीं हुई है. इस खबर के बाद आज बैंक के शेयर करीब 2.5% नीचे गिर गए. https://t.co/dZOE7zHIkk
— Milind Khandekar (@milindkhandekar) May 27, 2026
A closer look appears to have been ordered
The clarification followed reports in The Indian Express that alleged HDFC Bank had paid Rs 45 crore to MSRDC to attract large deposits.
The publisher claimed the payments were linked to “differential interest” — interest paid above the specified rate on deposits — and that the sums were routed through the marketing department and shown as spending on a road safety awareness campaign through local vendors rather than being directly credited as interest income.
The bank’s Audit Committee had ordered a formal “internal vigilance investigation" after an internal audit of the marketing department for FY25 reportedly flagged the payments and rated the department’s performance as "unsatisfactory".
Also Read | Taiwan overtakes India as world’s fifth-largest stock market amid AI boom
Markets take a dim view of the affair
The matter came under scrutiny around the time former part-time chairman Atanu Chakraborty resigned on March 18. Legal firms appointed by HDFC Bank had not found any material lapses in the bank’s processes so far, though the final outcome of the review is still awaited.
As of Wednesday afternoon, HDFC Bank shares had fallen about 2.45% after the reports surfaced.
The bank has not publicly confirmed any wrongdoing, and the matter remains one of scrutiny and denial rather than established findings.