The Delhi High Court on Thursday agreed to take on record an affidavit filed by Arvind Kejriwal alleging a possible conflict of interest in the ongoing proceedings related to the liquor policy case. However, the court made it clear that the matter had already been reserved for orders and would not be reopened for fresh arguments.
Affidavit raises apprehension of bias
Kejriwal, appearing via video conferencing, sought to formally place on record his concerns regarding Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma. In his affidavit, he claimed that the judge’s children are empanelled as government counsel, with professional links to the Centre. He argued that this association, particularly as Tushar Mehta is representing the CBI in the case, creates a reasonable apprehension of bias and warrants recusal.
Court accepts filing but draws line
The bench allowed the affidavit to be taken on record and directed that it be filed electronically through the registry. At the same time, it emphasised that the proceedings had already concluded and the judgment was reserved earlier this week. The court underlined that accepting the affidavit did not mean the case would be reopened or reheard.
Also Read | Court pulls up trial judge for improper handwriting comparison in divorce case
Background of the dispute
The issue stems from a revision petition filed by the CBI challenging the discharge of Kejriwal and other accused in the liquor policy case. During earlier hearings, Kejriwal had raised similar concerns orally, referring to discussions about the judge’s family members being associated with government legal panels. Following the hearing, he submitted the affidavit citing records of their empanelment and argued that such links should have been disclosed.
Also Read | Delhi court refuses bail in sexual assault case, cites seriousness of charges
The development adds another layer to an already high-profile case, though the court’s stance indicates that the outcome will be based on arguments already placed on record.
